http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6337
Summary: SelectionDAG.cpp has opporunity for code refactoring
Product: libraries
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Common Code Generator Code
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
There are many locations in SelectionDAG that should be using the
getScalarType() function instead of using the ?: operator.
849c849
< EVT EltVT = VT.isVector() ? VT.getVectorElementType() : VT;
---
> EVT EltVT = VT.getScalarType();
856c856
< EVT EltVT = VT.isVector() ? VT.getVectorElementType() : VT;
---
> EVT EltVT = VT.getScalarType();
870c870
< EVT EltVT = VT.isVector() ? VT.getVectorElementType() : VT;
---
> EVT EltVT = VT.getScalarType();
912,913c912
< EVT EltVT =
< VT.isVector() ? VT.getVectorElementType() : VT;
---
> EVT EltVT = VT.getScalarType();
946,947c945
< EVT EltVT =
< VT.isVector() ? VT.getVectorElementType() : VT;
---
> EVT EltVT = VT.getScalarType();
3034,3035c3032
< unsigned NumBits = VT.isVector() ?
< VT.getVectorElementType().getSizeInBits() : VT.getSizeInBits();
---
> unsigned NumBits = VT.getScalarType();
--
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
LLVMbugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
