http://www.llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6365
--- Comment #7 from Albert Zeyer <[email protected]> 2010-02-21 13:34:24 CST --- I dived a bit more into the code: CXXRecord is used for struct/class/enum/union all together? So the FIXME in DeclPrinter::VisitCXXRecordDecl // FIXME: Doesn't print access specifiers, e.g., "public:" is invalid then, isn't it? (Or at least for the case when it is a class.) But I guess it is not related at all to the problem. --- Btw., in my stl_tree.h, it looks like this: ... void destroy_node(_Link_type __p) { get_allocator().destroy(&__p->_M_value_field); _M_put_node(__p); } protected: template<typename _Key_compare, bool _Is_pod_comparator = std::__is_pod<_Key_compare>::__value> struct _Rb_tree_impl : public _Node_allocator { _Key_compare _M_key_compare; _Rb_tree_node_base _M_header; size_type _M_node_count; // Keeps track of size of tree. _Rb_tree_impl(const _Node_allocator& __a = _Node_allocator(), const _Key_compare& __comp = _Key_compare()) : _Node_allocator(__a), _M_key_compare(__comp), _M_node_count(0) { this->_M_header._M_color = _S_red; this->_M_header._M_parent = 0; this->_M_header._M_left = &this->_M_header; this->_M_header._M_right = &this->_M_header; } }; // Specialization for _Comparison types that are not capable of // being base classes / super classes. template<typename _Key_compare> struct _Rb_tree_impl<_Key_compare, true> : public _Node_allocator { _Key_compare _M_key_compare; _Rb_tree_node_base _M_header; size_type _M_node_count; // Keeps track of size of tree. _Rb_tree_impl(const _Node_allocator& __a = _Node_allocator(), const _Key_compare& __comp = _Key_compare()) : _Node_allocator(__a), _M_key_compare(__comp), _M_node_count(0) { this->_M_header._M_color = _S_red; this->_M_header._M_parent = 0; this->_M_header._M_left = &this->_M_header; this->_M_header._M_right = &this->_M_header; } }; ... I.e., the second _Rb_tree_impl is a specialisation of the first general declaration. In the output (printed by -ast-print), this is wrong. Should I make an addition bug report about this? Or is this problem related to the failing assert? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
