http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6536
Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> 2010-03-07 20:52:27 CST --- (In reply to comment #2) > It only gets rejected if you compile it as c++. That said, I think this is a > AST construction bug, the AST looks like this: > > void a() (CompoundStmt 0x1036181c0 <t.cc:2:10, col:40> > (GotoStmt 0x1036180a0 <col:12, col:17> 'out':0x103618070) > (DeclStmt 0x103617050 <col:22, col:25> > 0x1036180f0 "struct A x = > (CXXConstructExpr 0x103618160 <col:24> 'struct A''void (void)')" > (LabelStmt 0x103618070 <col:27, col:32> 'out' > (ReturnStmt 0x1036181a0 <col:32>))) > > > I'm pretty sure that x should not be initialized. Apparently, it should be initialized in C++0x but not in C++98/03! In C++0x, it appears that we do have an initializer (which calls the trivial default constructor), but that constructor doesn't actually do anything. Fixed for C++98/03 in r97928. Fixing it for '0x isn't a priority now, but I've left a FIXME there as a reminder. -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
