http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=6970
Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #2 from Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> 2010-04-28 19:57:47 CDT --- I am against adding this extension to Clang, because adding implicit conversions has a huge effect on overloading, template argument deduction, etc. and will make Clang non-conforming in ways that will be hard to detect or explain. No other compiler supports such an extension, so we aren't doing users any favors by allowing this. The proper way to get this change is to work through the C++ standards committee to get the change into an upcoming standard, and Clang will implement it then. -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
