http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=7529
Jakob Stoklund Olesen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #3 from Jakob Stoklund Olesen <[email protected]> 2010-07-05 22:39:56 CDT --- I think your patch in 107591 is definitely correct, and it should provide more ldm/stm folding, but the original 107114 only changed the behavior for loads and stores without any memoperands. 107591 doesn't add memoperands to to loads and stores that don't have any, right? -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
