http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8183
Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> 2010-09-19 01:44:43 CDT --- Sorry about the spam. Bugzilla keeps eating my post. Last try, this time w/o quoting: I'm not sure what you're surprised here. The warning from clang is *because* the argument will always be NULL. From what little I can see, this warning is working as intended, but of course, since you haven't posted the actual code, much less a nice reduced test case that shows the problem, I can't really help much. > Any suggestions to squelch the warning?? The warning itself told you: "note: consider using __builtin_trap() or qualifying pointer with 'volatile'". If you feel there is actually a bug here, please re-open with a test case and a specific problem with Clang's behavior when compiling the test case. Currently, I have no idea what real code led to this warning, or why you feel it was inappropriate for Clang to warn here. -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
