http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8528

Chris Lattner <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #14 from Chris Lattner <[email protected]> 2010-11-06 13:30:01 CDT 
---
This is fixed in r118346, we now reject the invalid instructions with:

t.s:1:1: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit suffix (could be
'fstps', 'fstpl', or 'fstpt')
fstp    (%rax)
^
t.s:2:1: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit suffix (could be
'fistps', or 'fistpl')
fistp (%rax)
^
t.s:3:1: error: ambiguous instructions require an explicit suffix (could be
'fists', or 'fistl')
fist (%rax)
^

Thanks again for tracking this down!

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
LLVMbugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs

Reply via email to