http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=7985
Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Douglas Gregor <[email protected]> 2010-11-09 16:53:01 CST --- I think Clang is behaving correctly (or, at least, reasonably) here. Instantiating the definition of a static data member shouldn't change its type, since we can choose any "use" at which to instantiate it. Admittedly, this is a grey area of the standard, and implementations are split: GCC allows the code, EDG and Clang rejects it. -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
