http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=8334
Yuri <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #5 from Yuri <[email protected]> 2010-11-13 22:29:44 CST --- This testcase fails in clang++ and succeeds in gcc. You are saying that they both do the same thing. This doesn't make sense. Possible solutions can be: 1. gcc and clang++ both succeed or both fail for me, then please provide versions of both. 2. gcc is wrong and clang++ is right, please explain why. 3. bug is fixed in clang++. This case is taken from the working project that only compiles under gcc and not clang. -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
