http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9851
Eli Friedman <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #3 from Eli Friedman <[email protected]> 2011-05-06 01:54:35 CDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > As far as I know reordering volatiles is perfectly valid. You need a memory > barrier if you want to enforce ordering. >From LangRef: "The optimizers must not change the number of volatile operations or change their order of execution relative to other volatile operations." -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
