http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9972
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #6 from [email protected] 2011-05-26 08:04:49 CDT --- :) That was it :) I read over Takumi's instructions more careful and that was what he meant when he said "It should be avoided. Clang has its alternatives." I commented out my line: AddPath("/usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux6E/4.4.4/include", System, true, false, false); and not all is well. This left no paths using the AddPath command and only paths defined with AddGnuCPlusPlusIncludePaths. Only one error now which is the hello.c bug#9990 I filed for x86 (duplicate for x86_64 is found here bug#8447). If you don't mind me asking, as I would like to help develop clang now that I've got me degree and free time ;) , how did you know that it was referencing the wrong headers? Just good plain ol' experience? -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
