http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10072
Yuri <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #2 from Yuri <[email protected]> 2011-06-03 20:58:46 CDT --- I don't think you are right. My original testcase has the last label xblkx.end which doesn't do what all other labels do. Labels xblkx.begin to xblkx.begin9 (8 of them) all set 'yes' variable to 1 (from 0). But label xblkx.end is also in 'indirectbr' but doesn't do that. Therefore 'indirectbr' or its equivalent should survive optimization. And it doesn't. In fact, my really original testcase (that I simplified into this one) produces wrong result with optimization and correct result without it, which should never ever happen. -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
