http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10315
Sean Hunt <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Sean Hunt <[email protected]> 2011-07-10 00:31:43 CDT --- This is correct behavior, although the diagnostic is quite lacking. The C++0x draft says that in the presence of a user-declared move constructor or move assignment operator, the implicit copy constructor and copy assignment operator are defined as deleted. Clang only recently implemented this, and I guess GCC 4.6.1 does not. -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
