http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10793

Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> 2011-08-27 17:30:12 
CDT ---
As Eli pointed out, we don't really try to emulate GCC's -fpermissive.

Bugs based on GCC's test suite for those features are not really compelling for
us to implement them. I personally have no desire to see this functionality.
Also, individual bug reports are a complete waste of time.

If you have a compelling reason to add support to Clang for these obscure,
non-standard features, file that as a single bug, and make your case. I
encourage you to point to large amounts of real world code that needs these
features. Even then, you may find that only you are motivated to make this
change, in which case you will most likely need to write the patches.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
LLVMbugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs

Reply via email to