http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11802
Andrew Trick <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED AssignedTo|unassignedclangbugs@nondot. |[email protected] |org | --- Comment #2 from Andrew Trick <[email protected]> 2012-01-20 18:23:41 CST --- I verified that clang trunk compiles this case using: /extra/mirror/build/Debug+Asserts/bin/clang -cc1 -triple i386-unknown-freebsd9.0 -emit-obj -disable-free -main-file-name siscale.c -pic-level 2 -mdisable-fp-elim -relaxed-aliasing -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases -target-cpu i486 -momit-leaf-frame-pointer -g -coverage-file ./soobj/siscale.o -resource-dir /usr/bin/../lib/clang/3.0 -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -Wno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fconst-strings -ferror-limit 19 -fmessage-length 128 -fno-builtin -fgnu-runtime -fobjc-runtime-has-arc -fobjc-runtime-has-weak -fobjc-fragile-abi -fno-common -fdiagnostics-show-option -fcolor-diagnostics -o siscale.o -x c siscale-sPvTkk.i This was probably fixed in r143183, well before the release, but wasn't merged into the release branch. At the time, I was concerned about disrupting the release cycle, but now that I understand the process better, I definitely should have merged it in knowing that people would likely hit it. -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
