http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12118
Bug #: 12118
Summary: Doesn't consider list initialization of
"initializer_list<X>" as a tie-breaker
Product: clang
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: C++0x
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], [email protected]
Classification: Unclassified
Clang gives an ambiguity for this:
void f(initializer_list<int>);
void f(int);
int main() { f({0}); }
However C++11 13.3.3.2p3 last bullet says that the list initialization sequence
of the first f is better than that for the second f.
--
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
LLVMbugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
