http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11359
David Blaikie <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #5 from David Blaikie <[email protected]> 2012-05-09 02:11:11 CDT --- LLVM/Clang basically uses a "fire and forget" release process, so no fixes for lambdas have or will be backported to 3.0. It was unfortunate we released without Eli's fix, but that's how it went. In 3.1 lots of good lambda things work - anything that doesn't should be reported as a bug. (but, equally, 3.1 will release soon - so unless it's a really awesome (crashy, probably) bug it probably won't make it into 3.1 & we'll just have to live with it and fix it for 3.2) -- Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
