http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13175
Bug #: 13175
Summary: linker_private_weak_def_auto is the same as
linker_private_weak + unnamed_addr?
Product: libraries
Version: trunk
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: Core LLVM classes
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Classification: Unclassified
Now that we have unnamed_addr as an orthogonal concept to the linkage, is
linker_private_weak_def_auto redundant? Should we remove it (with upgrade
support, of course)?
--
Configure bugmail: http://llvm.org/bugs/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
LLVMbugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
