http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15254

Sean Silva <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #7 from Sean Silva <[email protected]> ---
I'm marking this issue as FIXED because the core issue (that the acronym AST
was not defined) has been addressed. Please file a separate bug for any
remaining concerns.

> Are the involved software developers aware of a design requirement to
> distinguish a bit better between syntax and semantic processing?

Syntax and semantic processing are inherently intertwined in C++ and to a
lesser extent C. You literally cannot parse them without semantic information,
so those two parts cannot be fully decoupled.

> Does any documentation show the clear separation of concerns in your specific
> processing pipeline implementation?

See <http://clang.llvm.org/docs/InternalsManual.html>.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
LLVMbugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs

Reply via email to