http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=15723
Howard Hinnant <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Howard Hinnant <[email protected]> --- 2. "0x0" fails for the same reasons. 3. This is the exact same test as 2. 4. Fails because ss.fail() is false. Value of ld is 1.79769e+3081 5. Fails because ss.fail() is false. Value of ld is 1.79769e+3089 6. Fails because ss.fail() is false. Value of ld is 1.17977e+309 7. Fails because ss.fail() is false. Value of ld is 9.17977e+309 For me: std::numeric_limits<long double>::max() == 1.189731495357231765021264e+4932 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
