http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16621
trss <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID |--- Summary|False negatives by |Request to remove warning |-Wselector apart from false |-Wselector due to perceived |positives |false negatives apart from | |false positives --- Comment #2 from trss <[email protected]> --- The following is with reference to the comment at http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=12322#c5 (In reply to comment #5) > -Wselector was brought over from gcc to enforce a specific rule that once > was thought > is important; namely, if a method is used in an @selector expression, it > must also > be implemented in the same TU. If you think it is no longer relevant and > misleading > in your case, please file a bug report requesting a new option (while > turning this > off with -Wno-selector). > Only on trying to verbalize the new option, that is, the semantics I expected this warning to have, did I realize that such a warning is unrealistic to implement. However, that doesn't change the fact that I find this warning to be misleading as illustrated by the perceived false negatives in the description of this bug report at http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16621#c0 Hence, though I don't feel qualified to decide whether this is no longer relevant, if it is indeed seen as no longer relevant by a qualified person (such as someone who has made use of this warning in the past), I request this warning to be removed. Thank you trss -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
