http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16649
[email protected] <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID |--- --- Comment #3 from [email protected] <[email protected]> --- I'm sorry, I should try reading the diagnostic. That's about returning bool. Ignore my comment. The derived foo method does not get the noreturn attribute and we don't warn about it, but we do assume that all implementations of foo are noreturn at the call site. Clang should probably be changed to either not assume that or warn on method overrides that aren't also noreturn. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
