http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16770
Howard Hinnant <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Howard Hinnant <[email protected]> --- This looks like a very good direction to me. However the addition of constexpr to functions and member functions is a non-conforming extension. Even the C++1y-conforming constexpr additions we are wrapping in macros to ensure that they are not turned on when C++11 is asked for. The addition of constexpr can, amazingly, cause runtime errors. The way to make this happen is to write a paper for the C++ committee: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/ Anyone can participate in the C++ standardization process, and many do. It is a lot of work. You don't get everything you ask for. It takes a long time. And many find the work rewarding. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
