http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16983
Richard Smith <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Richard Smith <[email protected]> --- This code is ill-formed, because 9223372036854775808 does not fit into the largest signed integer type. We accept it as a GNU extension, and that extension gives it an unsigned type. (Note that we do not treat __int128 as an extended integer type, since that would be an ABI-breaking change, so we cannot give the integer literal that type.) Unary - preserves the promoted type of its operand, so the resulting decltype type is also unsigned. The only bug I can find here is that -pedantic-errors doesn't reject this code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
