http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17526
Richard Smith <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Richard Smith <[email protected]> --- Yes, -Wconditional-uninitialized has false positives. If you don't want false positives, don't use it -- use -Wuninitialized instead. This is by design: this isn't a decidable problem, and we have -Wuninitialized for the no-false-positives side and -Wconditional-uninitialized for the no-false-negatives case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
