http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=17622
Bug ID: 17622
Summary: Different sscanf results from clang++ and g++
Product: clang
Version: 3.0
Hardware: PC
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: -New Bugs
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
CC: [email protected]
Classification: Unclassified
I'm getting different results between clang++ and g++ using sscanf().
Output and code below.
I'm running Debian 7.0 64 bit and using the debian packages for gcc and clang.
$ clang++ --version
Debian clang version 3.0-6.2 (tags/RELEASE_30/final) (based on LLVM 3.0)
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
$ g++ --version
g++ (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2
$ g++ sscanf_test.cc -o sscanf_test
$ ./sscanf_test
1 successful; buf is helloworld
6 successful; pos is rnbqkb1r/ppppp1pp/7n/4Pp2/8/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKBNR
$ clang++ sscanf_test.cc -o sscanf_test
$ ./sscanf_test
1 successful; buf is helloworld
6 successful; pos is
----------------------------sscanf_test.cc----------------------------
#include <stdio.h>
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
char buf[128];
int successful = sscanf("helloworld", "%s", buf);
printf("%d successful; buf is %s\n", successful, buf);
char mv, pos[128], cas[4], enps[2];
int halfm = 0, fullm = 1;
successful = sscanf(
"rnbqkb1r/ppppp1pp/7n/4Pp2/8/8/PPPP1PPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq f6 0 3",
"%s %c %s %s %d %d",
pos, &mv, cas, enps, &halfm, &fullm
);
printf("%d successful; pos is %s\n", successful, pos);
return 0;
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
LLVMbugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
