http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=18079
Richard Smith <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Richard Smith <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #0) > Which is correct? Since Clang differs from the two major implementations, my > guess would be that Clang was in the wrong, but I don't really know how to > read the C++ spec to be sure... MSVC is not known for its conformance, and in this case, it and GCC are wrong. EDG agrees with Clang. [class.access](11)/9: "The names in a default template-argument (14.1) have their access checked in the context in which they appear rather than at any points of use of the default template-argument." (Followed by an example that is nearly an exact match of yours.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
