http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14743
David Blaikie <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from David Blaikie <[email protected]> --- Resolved through a combination of fixing the test case (it was expecting gnu89 inlining semantics rather than Clang's default of c99) and fixing Clang in r206130. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
