http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19486
Richard Smith <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #1 from Richard Smith <[email protected]> --- That's correct behavior, I'm afraid. The initializer is required to be semantically valid when we get to the end of the class, not just when we get to a constructor that uses it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
