http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19620
Bug ID: 19620
Summary: clang doesn't treat a typedef-name as a class-name
when naming the destructor
Product: clang
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++11
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], [email protected]
Classification: Unclassified
consider:
typedef struct T {} I;
typedef const I
CI;
void blah(I *a) {
a->CI::~I();
}
clang gives:
<stdin>:5:11: error: expected the class name after '~' to name a destructor
a->CI::~I();
^
9.1 [class.name]/5 states that a typedef-name may behave like a class-name once
it's qualifiers are ignored.
5.1.1 [expr.prim.general]/8 has the requirement that, when naming the
destructor, the two class-names must refer to the same class-name.
When keeping the above two rules in mind, there doesn't seem to be a rationale
for rejecting this code.
GCC, EDG and MSVC all accept.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
LLVMbugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
