http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=19631
Filip Roséen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID |--- --- Comment #4 from Filip Roséen <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #1) > Your quote from the standard shows that Clang is correct to accept this. The > specialization is in a namespace enclosing N. Since it's got a qualified > name, the second restriction does not apply. I also note that you write "the specialization is in a namespace enclosing N", that's not what the standard is talking about. It's talking about the _namespace enclosing the template_, not _the namespace enclosing the namespace enclosing the template_. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
