http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20950
Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #2 from Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> --- We have a related warning under -Wimplicit-fallthrough, but it isn't on by default due to false positives on existing code bases. $ clang++ t.cpp -c -Wimplicit-fallthrough t.cpp:8:5: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough] case 2: m = 3; ^ t.cpp:8:5: note: insert '[[clang::fallthrough]];' to silence this warning case 2: m = 3; ^ [[clang::fallthrough]]; t.cpp:8:5: note: insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through case 2: m = 3; ^ break; t.cpp:9:5: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough] case 3: m = 4; ^ t.cpp:9:5: note: insert '[[clang::fallthrough]];' to silence this warning case 3: m = 4; ^ [[clang::fallthrough]]; t.cpp:9:5: note: insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through case 3: m = 4; ^ break; t.cpp:10:5: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough] case 4: m = 5; ^ t.cpp:10:5: note: insert '[[clang::fallthrough]];' to silence this warning case 4: m = 5; ^ [[clang::fallthrough]]; t.cpp:10:5: note: insert 'break;' to avoid fall-through case 4: m = 5; ^ break; 3 warnings generated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
