http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16711

Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |---

--- Comment #6 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <[email protected]> ---
Reopening. The reasoning is:

* A linker doing an optimization doesn't mean it is not profitable to do it in
the IR too.
* We will print more readable assembly.
* Not all linkers handle all types of constants. We can be more general.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
LLVMbugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs

Reply via email to