http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21074
David Majnemer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Assignee|unassignedclangbugs@nondot. |[email protected] |org | --- Comment #1 from David Majnemer <[email protected]> --- This is the same as PR21062. The assertion didn't fire because RTTI added a component which made us believe we had a non-empty VFTable. However, we need to have at least one non-RTTI VFTable component. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 21062 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
