http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16047
Patrik Hägglund <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Patrik Hägglund <[email protected]> --- The C standard defect report #451 is related to this issue. The committe have now answered defect report #451, http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/dr_451.htm, and is seems like LLVM/Clang will (in a future revision of the standard) be safe, doing this kind of optimizations. The answer suggests introducing a notion of "wobbly" values, that I think this will apply in this case. Therefore, I close this issue for now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
