http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21470
Nick Lewycky <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Nick Lewycky <[email protected]> --- Right. The function has to retain its non-returnedness, and it does. It can't just replace it with nothing but a "ret undef". Sorry, I misunderstood when Reid told me about this bug, I thought it was replacing it with a "ret undef" and no infinite self-recursion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
