https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23042
Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #5 from Reid Kleckner <[email protected]> --- We shouldn't accept the no-operand version of this. On different platforms, foo might have a mangled name like _foo, _Z3foov, or _foo@4. The assembly would need to use this name, and clang cannot know this name until it does codegen. LLVM also has the right to rename functions like foo, since it is static. So, ultimately I don't think this is feasible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
