https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23546
Bug ID: 23546
Summary: cv-qualifiers not ignored on function type
Product: clang
Version: 3.6
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++11
Assignee: [email protected]
Reporter: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], [email protected]
Classification: Unclassified
[dcl.fct] ยง8.3.5/7 says,
"The effect of a cv-qualifier-seq in a function declarator is not the same as
adding cv-qualification on top of the function type. In the latter case, the
cv-qualifiers are ignored."
The last sentence doesn't seem to be implemented. The test below is
well-formed, but generates various errors including a warning, "qualifier on
function type 't' (aka 'void ()') has unspecified behavior."
Johannes Schaub says that this is a C++11 feature. Perhaps it should be
contingent on the language flag.
typedef void t();
void f();
t const f;
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
LLVMbugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
