https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=23539
Nico Weber <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #14 from Nico Weber <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #12) > >Our ASan bots are on 10.7 and will stay there for at least a few more > >months. (We > >don't have any plans for upgrading them at the moment.) > > OS X adoption rates are very high; for example, 55% are already on 10.10. I > suspect only a small percentage of users are running on < 10.9. Is there a > reason not to upgrade the buildbots 10.10 or 10.9 in the long term? This is not true in our experience. When a new OS X version is released, many initial adoption is pretty fast but many people stay around on their current version for a long time. (And for some reason 10.6 is very popular, it's often the 2nd-most popular release after the current one.) samsonov: I'm trying to look at this now. Doing a build of clang with MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.6 now dies in compiler-rt's cmake with Too old OS X version: 10.6 It looks like http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20150622/284048.html added MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET as the default deployment version for compiler-rt. That's not correct. MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET at clang build time specifies which version of OS X the clang I'm building should run on, not the version of OS X the binaries produced by that clang should run on. I need to be able to build a clang that runs on 10.6. The asan'd binaries it produces can assume 10.7, but the compiler itself needs to be able to run on 10.6, and it needs to be able to produce (non-asan) binaries for 10.6. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________ LLVMbugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmbugs
