Hi, Am Montag, 7. Juni 2010, um 17:50:48 schrieb Stefan Fendt: > The parent should trigger the child and not vice versa (as it seems to > be in current state). Why? The parent is the only one knowing what > input-sources it needs and when it needs them, so in some slightly > oversimplified pseudo-code this would be something like this: This code indeed looks more clear and logical to me. I'd like a solution based on this code. Especially this could be advanced for avoiding processing unused FX sends (i.e. such ones that never get routed to master).
Andrew (who developed the FX send support), any comments on this? Toby
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
