Am 30.08.2010 17:40, schrieb Tobias Doerffel: Hi Toby,
> Done. ;-) fine... so, let's pull again,... ;-) >> The only reason I didn't do this mthreaded was that it didn't show to be >> slower without... >> > Did you try under full load, i.e. multiple channels loaded with various CPU > intensive LADSPA plugins? > Yes,... the first file I encountered this behaviour with was using ~80% load overall on my quadcore-machine, so in the first place I thought of an ladspa-bug or so (quite complicated setup with lot's of FX but only 8 Channels in use -> e-guitar-simulation using vibes). With the non-mt-mixer it still remained being there cpu-load-wise (in fact I had the feeling — but didn't explicitly test for it — it might even be a little faster than before)... Stefan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
