On 01/10/2014 12:29 PM, David Gerard wrote: > On 10 January 2014 08:34, Tobias Doerffel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> To be clear: not the old master branch but either a new one we're going to >> create or even better: stable-0.4! Otherwise the patches won't apply. >> IMHO we should go away from the concept of stable and development branches. >> Instead there should be one branch where stabilized feature branches get >> merged in. Every N weeks there should be a release. Of course we can still >> provide an experimental branch where all feature branches regularly get >> merged in (for users wanting to use bleeding edge unstable LMMS) but >> development should not happen against this experimental/master branch. > > Excellent! Will the distro package maintainers be able to keep up with > this? (Will the distros let them?) >
Probably depends on the distro... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
