> I'd prefer option 3 as this is the most generic and flexible one - the plugin > (controller) does not have to rely on an external component but is able to > mute the sound afterwards on its own. Agreed. The counter argument I had was: You wonder why you have no sound on your channel, and trying to find the guilty effect, you think the peak controller can not be the reason, since it is supposed to be a read-only-effect. But yes, I think being able to mute seems more generic. > BTW another workaround: insert an amplifier effect afterwards and simply set > volume to 0. I used this until now, but that way, it gets more comfortable.
Anyways, if no one else thinks that point 3 is a bad idea, I'll submit a patch the next days. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
