On 16 January 2014 22:59, Tobias Doerffel <tobias.doerf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your willingness to take care of this feature! First of all:
> please work on top of the stable-0.4-new-fx-mixer-branch as otherwise it'll
> be extra work to port the changes to this branch (which is going to be
> merged into stable-0.4 sooner or later).

It's great to be able to contribute. :)
Ok, I'll work with fx-mixer branch.

> I propose to add a global flag to the FxMixer class which indicates whether
> solo is active for any channel. When rendering (FxChannel::doProcessing())
> check this flag and if it is true, only proceed in the doProcessing() method
> if the FxChannels own m_soloModel.value() is true as well. The soloModel's
> dataChanged() signal should be connected to a slot which sets clears state
> all other soloModels and updates the global flag depending on whether the
> specified FX channel is solo.
>
> On the FxMixerView side, add an LED-Button for the m_soloModel. That should
> be all.

Understood. Will start the work ASAP. :D


-- 
Gurjot Singh
Blog: http://bhattigurjot.wordpress.com

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between.
Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to