On 03/03/2014 11:15 AM, Tobias Doerffel wrote: > This would of course have a severe impact on performance - probably > one of the reasons we didn't deploy this in many places yet. > > Toby
A thought: Could we maybe implement this in such a way that the instrument/effect/whatever checks if there's a controller/automation/etc. connected to the control, and only use the buffer if there is, and otherwise just get the value the regular way? That should mitigate some of the performance concerns. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
