On 03/06/2014 09:45 AM, Raine M. Ekman wrote: > Citerar Vesa <[email protected]>: >> Actually now that I think about this, I think this is one thing we could >> do before 1.0.0 (since it will break backwards compatibility): modify >> time signature so that the denominator is constrained to binary >> exponents, like it is on actual time signatures. Time sigs that LMMS >> allows - such as 5/9, 3/11, etc. - make no sense as time sigs, and they >> cause weird behaviour, because they produce tact lengths that don't >> correspond to any actual note sizes (apart from the tick-sized 192th >> notes...) > It's the cutting edge of modern music, really: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_signature#Irrational_meters > > :) >
Right, sure, and if we used time sigs the same way they're used in traditional notation, I'd think we should keep them. But since we use "time signature" differently (see my earlier response to Rob), those irrational meters don't really make sense for us. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
