To summarize what has been said in this post: If there'd be a port of ZynAddSubFX to Qt, it would be a subwindow inside LMMS (inside like e.g. the B&B editor is a subwindow). Inside this ZASF window, we'd have an MDI area with all ZASF subwindows, so they'd be encapsulated.
I'd like to ask something more here. Whenever you click on a track with an instrument right now, you get a small window with "PLUGIN", "ENV/LFO", "FUNC", "FX", "MIDI". Should the mentioned ZASF main window be equal to the "PLUGIN" window, or should it be started from there (with a button, like it is now)? If both windows were equal, we'd save one window. However, some ppl (including me?) might be confused by the new large window that opens immediately. What do you think? -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/ZynAddSubFX-in-internal-window-tp5036p6868.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Subversion Kills Productivity. Get off Subversion & Make the Move to Perforce. With Perforce, you get hassle-free workflows. Merge that actually works. Faster operations. Version large binaries. Built-in WAN optimization and the freedom to use Git, Perforce or both. Make the move to Perforce. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=122218951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
