Maybe the knobs should be placed in the order start-loopback-end?
2014-04-04 6:18 GMT+03:00 Tres Finocchiaro <tres.finocchi...@gmail.com>: > Here's what I've gotten so far. In case you think its worth using, I'll > zip what I've done and send it along in a separate email. > > http://i.imgur.com/W7nDgZc.png > > > - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Tres Finocchiaro < > tres.finocchi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Vesa <dii....@nbl.fi> wrote: >> >>> On 04/03/2014 05:28 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: >>> > I had some time to start arranging components for the extra knobs and >>> > buttons. Screenshot provided. Feedback welcome. >>> > >>> > http://i.imgur.com/5EgSK4Q.png >>> >>> You've got one too many button and one too many knob... >>> >> >> Thanks, I read all emails extensively and was having a hard time >> determining. "Loopback" makes perfect sense now you've described it. >> >> With this feedback, I'll work more towards this tonight. >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > LMMS-devel mailing list > LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
