i think that every programmer here understands the difference between ftp and git work and also about project/presets store and modifications.
On 29.04.2014 12:26, Vesa wrote: > Eh, that just seems like too much complexity. We'd have to code in a > understandable and easily usable API for all of this (because the vast > majority of our user base is not comfortable with command line > commands or git). We'd have to integrate all of this into the rest of > LMMS and that would mean huge increase in complexity that we'd have to > also maintain. yes, users don't need command line commands, it must be a part of GUI and Web (that is working for git and needs some tweaks) for pro users well they will be able to work with git also i guess. > And if we still need LSP for samples, then we need two mechanisms, and > that doubles the work... Better to keep it simple and maintainable. depends on how many samples there "is simplicity best or simply easiest" (dm)? i understand that rebuild and rewrite the code is not fun, but it depends on result. -- Symbiants oe ai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available. Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel
