On 05/19/2014 09:59 PM, Tobias Doerffel wrote:
> 2014-05-19 20:45 GMT+02:00 Vesa <dii....@nbl.fi>:
>> Ones that are still uncertain:
>> - the sample-exact models and the new buffer-passing architecture - I've
>> been working on it today locally, and I've got most of the structures in
>> place, partially rewrote the LFO controller while I was at it, I'm just
>> running to some segfaults and stuff and it's hard to say at this point
>> if it's going to get done, or if we should move it to 1.2.
> I think we should postpone it to 1.2 except we manage to get
> everything stable and rock-solid within the next weeks (which I doubt
> speaking for myself).
>
>

In that case, should we maybe create a separate branch for it, so it'd
be possible to collaborate on this?

To elaborate, I have this working already in such a way that existing,
non-sample-exact models (ie. all of them) still work as they always
have, even with controllers - it's just the new sample-exact
buffer-passing methods that are still causing problems.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE
Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos.
Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available
Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free."
http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs
_______________________________________________
LMMS-devel mailing list
LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lmms-devel

Reply via email to